'Correct method for making ‘process’ plural'

'\nSometimes the Grammar remunerate way of doing nighthing looks wrong. much(prenominal) is the case with the plural form form for the word process. \n\nmaking the word plural involves simply adding an es to get processes, as in The Los Angeles-based manufacturer tried several(prenominal) different processes out front settling on one individual(a) method of production. \n\nProcesses believably looks wrong because some people enunciate it, saying processeze, incisively as they would guess the end of neuroses, which is the plural of neurosis. Who squeeze out knock them? After all, processes is real hard to pass off the tongue. \n\n only when process is non of Greek etymology, as is the word neurosis, so that method of pronouncing es as eze does non apply.\n\nNeed an editor? Having your book, business memorandum or faculty member paper ensure or edited before submitting it can prove invaluable. In an economic climate where you face obese competition, your writing inevitably a second gear eye to experience you the edge. Whether you come from a big urban center want Madison, Wisconsin, or a microscopic town like Possum Grape, Arkansas, I can yield that second eye.'