Which was more important as a reason for the failure of the League of Nations in the 1930's? The absence of the USA or Britain and France's self interest

The visitation of the conference of Nations in the 1930?s was due to ii main reasons. Firstly, the absence of the USA. The confederation of Nations was thought up by the American president Woodrow Wilson it was one of his 14 points. He had bandage to up with the idea, the league was in a sense his child, besides he was allowed no component part in it. The American cozy intercourse had refused to become members of The confederation and this caused all sorts of problems. America had the biggest mass application and without them agreeing to economic sanctions they would be no use at all. That is what happened when Mussolini invaded Abyssinia, the League imposed sanctions but America continued to change with Italy, this meant that the sanctions were useless. some other sanction that did not work without the foster of the USA was forces sanctions. Britain and France?s armies had both been weakened by the crusade and the recumb of the alliance was relying on them to provide the troop. If America had been part of the League, they could confine produced lots of troops for the army and the military sanctions would be more than good. Another thing is that the USA is a rattling mighty and rich country, the moral condemnation would have been more effective if the USA had been part of the League. Secondly Britain and France put their knowledge interests in front of the interests of the League. They made secret conformitys with other countries tooshie the league?s fundament. In 1935 ? during the crisis with Mussolini, the British and French irrelevant Ministers, time-tested to make a pact with Mussolini. It was named the Hoare Laval pact and it aimed to outpouring Mussolini two-thirds of Abyssinia. They were prepared to carry out the pact without even consulting with the League or with Abyssinia?s President Haile Selassie. Britain and France in any case made a pact with Italy know as the Stressa Pact, this formalised commitment to broo k fall in with Italy against Germany. It wa! s obvious that they were more interested in keeping on good terms with countries then delivery justice to countries that had make incorrect (the Hoare Laval pact) instead of punishing Italy they were sacking to give them about everything they necessitateed just to keep the Stressa Pact in place, and to stay on good terms with Italy. Britain and France refused to use their troops for the League?s army.

They had both been staidly weakened by the war and the last thing they wanted was for their troops go conflict again. This meant that the League had no army and that Military Sanctions were useless. Britain and France also held back on economic sanctions as everyone had been hit badly by the depression and imposing economic sanctions helped no one. boilersuit I bet that the most important reason for the failure of the League was that Britain and France put their own interests in front of the interests of the League. I think this because the league was doing really well all the through and through the 1920?s they handled all their crisis well, however as soon as Britain and France started displace their own needs before the League?s everything went wrong and the League made all the wrong decisions by in the end was completely disgraced. Bibliography : my own study notes + GCSE forward-looking knowledge domain history text book - randomness edition If you want to get a full essay, tack it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay